• n3m37h
    12·
    2 months ago

    He probably didn’t say “and” If he did that it would be miss quoting which IMO is worse

    • enkers
      3·
      2 months ago

      You’re nitpicking. It’s not a direct quote anyways; it’s already paraphrased. They had no issue editorializing “them” to “companies”, so adding an implied “and” wouldn’t be any worse than that.

      • n3m37h
        14·
        2 months ago

        Pot calling kettle black, I understood the title without the bloody and

        • enkers
          2·
          2 months ago

          Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment, because I’m not sure I understand what you’re trying to say here.

          Are you saying my version of the title would have been fine without the “and” I added? I’m struggling to understand what you’re taking issue with.