• ArbitraryValue
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If they weren’t in the EU then they wouldn’t have let the migrants in in the first place.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        No. All that does is give putin full control, essentially turning the country into a hostile vassal state like belarus, right at the Austrian border.

        • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          As opposed to being an hostile vassal state that can veto EU decisions and undermine european security from within? Where do I sign?

          • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Yes, of course. As long as we let them stay in the union they have a fairly large amount of EU rules and regulations they have to abide by, and can’t go full little Russia.

            The fact that Hungary can stall and blockade critical decisions is a structural failure in the EU governing system that needs amendment, not a reason to give a hostile country a literal foothold nation.

            Ideally additional protective measures against foreign interference would also be implemented that keep future meddling at bay.

            • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Pray tell how do you ammend the rules, considering such changes need to be unanimous?

              And it’s better to have a clear enemy at your gates than one badly hidden inside the gates (just ask the trojans).