Seriously, what the fuck is this?

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because quality doesn’t really matter if it’s glasses you’re wearing on and off to read things close to your eyes but if you read a lot you won’t buy cheap dollar tree glasses and if it’s to see at a distance you’ll wear the glasses at all times.

    My vision is better than yours and I still wouldn’t do shit without my glasses.

    • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The quality of my prescription is just fine, even if it is outdated. The quality of the lenses and frames is what’s messed up. The lenses are scratched to hell and back, and the frames snapped in two over a year ago and are rigged back up with a hairpin.

      And of course, Walmart is shutting down all of their health centers…

      I’d be ecstatic if I could just get my last prescription remade by a different company in different frames. It’s not like the lenses are out of focus, they’re just extremely scratched up.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Ok, back to my point and not whatever you understood, it’s about the quality of the glasses, not the prescription. Hell, your prescription is clear, both your eyes aren’t the same, try to find dollar tree glasses with different prescriptions in each eyes, good luck.

        • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Dollar Tree is not an option for me. They legally cannot sell negative prescriptions for myopia (nearsightedness). They only sell positive prescriptions for farsightedness.

          Go ahead, go check. You won’t find a negative lens anywhere off of a cheap rack.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s what I keep telling you, there’s a reason for that, your asked why, I explained why.

            • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              No, you explained that I have a slight difference between each eye. Obviously. That’s beside the point.

              If I got generic lenses of -4.5 in both eyes, that would do me plenty well enough. Definitely better than no glasses at all.

              But they do not sell any generic negative lenses off the shelf.

              It’s like the system decided to be prejudice against nearsighted people for the corporate wallet.

                • over_clox@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You speak of quality. Where’s the quality when my $200+ lenses already have 4 scratches before I even get to the vehicle to head home?

                  • Kecessa
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Sounds like a you issue more than a quality issue to me.