• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1622 days ago

    I don’t think “both sides”. I think they are the same side. That of establishment, or of elites, or of “the rich” if you like that rhetoric.

    We wouldn’t be having courts openly consider resetting our entire legal system to the 1770s including full blown racist laws, we wouldn’t be fighting for our basic rights. The level to which you’re completely wrong is HIGH.

    Yes, threatening you with “authoritarianism or barbarism” is more persuasive if barbarism is real. I’m not saying there’s anything else on the ballot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 days ago

      One side: We are rich and hate poor people.

      The other side: We are rich and hate poor people, and also want to kill minorities and the people we think are deviants.

      You: wow, totally the same.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 days ago

          I’m pretty sure the world can exist without Nazis. In fact, it did for a long time. It’s only recent history.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -121 days ago

            I meant that Republicans and Democrats of today can’t exist without each other.

            Also no, it didn’t.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              221 days ago

              They absolutely can. You could have democrats party as it is today and then a socialist party. The Republican party does not have to exist at all for Democrat party to exist.