@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 21 days agoFigure it out, you self-righteous hack.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1305arrow-down1144file-text
arrow-up1161arrow-down1imageFigure it out, you self-righteous hack.lemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected]English • 21 days agomessage-square111fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Varyklink8•edit-221 days agoyou think israel should complete their genocide…and the genocide of palestine will improve global warming. your critical reasoning and your regular reasoning is critically flawed and objectively inaccurate.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink-16•21 days agoI don’t feel like retyping my last comment, so just click my name and read my most recent one.
minus-square@Varyklink12•edit-221 days agoi read it, seems completely irrelevant to the topic. you should slow down, your post and comments are not making any sense.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilink-13•21 days agoIt’s not a hard argument to follow. The problem might be on your end.
minus-square@Varyklink10•edit-221 days agonot hard to follow, and not correct. a palestinian genocide does not prevent millions of climate-related deaths.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•21 days agoI think there’s definitely some miscommunication here, rather than just misinterpretation. I don’t think Varyk is in opposition to your essential point.
you think israel should complete their genocide…and the genocide of palestine will improve global warming.
your critical reasoning and your regular reasoning is critically flawed and objectively inaccurate.
I don’t feel like retyping my last comment, so just click my name and read my most recent one.
i read it, seems completely irrelevant to the topic.
you should slow down, your post and comments are not making any sense.
It’s not a hard argument to follow. The problem might be on your end.
not hard to follow, and not correct.
a palestinian genocide does not prevent millions of climate-related deaths.
I think there’s definitely some miscommunication here, rather than just misinterpretation. I don’t think Varyk is in opposition to your essential point.