• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    616 days ago

    You mean the “at launch” part that the writer added to the article and isn’t a part of the official Saber statement? Something you’d know if you read the article past the introductory paragraph?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -516 days ago

      Yes, that “at launch”. But you trust that FAQ, not like I want to do anything about that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        316 days ago

        Have you considered taking therapy? Because you’re literally making up shit to hate on a game, it’s not healthy.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -116 days ago

          I’m sharing my distrust in the communication to the players based on shit that happened in the past. But thanks for the personal attack disguised as concern.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            316 days ago

            Actually I found it pretty disturbing that you’d make shit up just to throw a shade, so I’d consider the concern genuine even if poorly communicated.

            Seriously, normal people don’t go “but what if they’re lying” any time something is said.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              116 days ago

              They do when lied to often. Doesn’t need to be the same source, just the same ballpark.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                116 days ago

                I’m just going to repeat what I said. Normal people don’t go “but what if they’re lying” any time something is said. They do it when it’s the same entity doing the saying, like if Ubisoft said they’re going to try something different normal people wouldn’t believe then, but normal people don’t generalize everyone. Just because Ubisoft or EA or ActiBliz has told lies doesn’t mean EVERY developer tells lies. It’s incredibly toxic to think everyone is lying.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  116 days ago

                  It is incredibly toxic, do you think that I do that? Over a “Why the over specific denial”? Seems a bit harsh. Are normal people that harsh?

                  It’s a lived example of the “one bad apple spoils the bunch”. There are quite a few bad apples in the publisher space, some on the developer side. Do normal people just not recognize patterns in an industry? Are normal people apathetic about how an industry treats them?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    116 days ago

                    It is incredibly toxic, do you think that I do that? Over a “Why the over specific denial”?

                    But you did. Everyone else was either optimistic or “yeah, whatever” about the statement, only you went “there must be something wrong with the statement”. You are literally the only person in this thread questioning if it’s genuine.

                    It’s a lived example of the “one bad apple spoils the bunch”. There are quite a few bad apples in the publisher space, some on the developer side. Do normal people just not recognize patterns in an industry? Are normal people apathetic about how an industry treats them?

                    This is how bigots talk. “Some black people are bad people so I will treat all black people as bad people”. “Some immigrants are bad people so all immigrants are bad”. “Some young folk are lazy so all young folk are lazy”. etc.

                    People notice patterns, as I pointed out with Ubisoft and Blizzard and EA. But people don’t make sweeping generalizations based on those patterns. Just because Ubisoft is shitty doesn’t mean we should be questioning everything Larian says. The problem isn’t skepticism, the problem is that you’re making huge generalizations to then be skeptical which leads you to make unfounded criticism.

          • Lightor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            116 days ago

            Well your stance is “don’t trust them” because they could lie. Then why listen to anything they say at all or engage in the convo?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -116 days ago

              Interesting choices of questions. I don’t listen to what they say, I look at what they did. Hence my opinion.

              Why do I engage in this convo? Not much to do on a Monday evening. Why do you engage in this convo?

              • Lightor
                link
                fedilink
                English
                116 days ago

                Well I was looking for an engaging convo, not chat with someone doesn’t trust anyone or anything. It seems there’s no shared perception of reality we can have a conversation about, it happens.