• @iAmTheTot
    link
    -705 days ago

    I mean, I’m not sure how well this particular case will prove that point. They are a publisher and they’ve (at least so far) insisted that they will rehire and honour existing contracts. I’m not an expert in the field but I don’t see this hugely impacting any upcoming games’ quality.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      “We had to rehire our talented employees to continue making good games” would seemingly make the point very strongly that the workers bring value, not the owner?

      • @iAmTheTot
        link
        -355 days ago

        They don’t make the games though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          315 days ago

          Fair point, but it’s kicking the can down the road. Insert “…to continue publishing good games,” “…to continue doing good work,” “…to continue functioning” instead and the argument still works. But you’re right, they’re a publisher, not a developer, that’s my mistake.

          • @iAmTheTot
            link
            275 days ago

            The workers at the game studios that Annapurna works with, seeing as how they are a publisher not a developer.

            • @xmunk
              link
              84 days ago

              To be fair - the best publishers I’ve worked with have actively worked to make sure resourcing that’s needed is allocated even if it’s been beyond our means.

          • mozingo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            They’re a publisher, not a developer. Publishers don’t make games. They sell them.