The year 2023 was by far the warmest in human history. Climate extremes now routinely shock in their intensity, with a direct monetary cost that borders on the unfathomable. Over $3 trillion (US) in damages to infrastructure, property, agriculture, and human health have already slammed the world economy this century, owing to extreme weather. That number will likely pale in comparison to what is coming. The World Economic Forum, hardly a hotbed of environmental activists, now reports that global damage from climate change will probably cost some $1.7 trillion to $3.1 trillion (US) per year by 2050, with the lion’s share of the damage borne by the poorest countries in the world.

And yet we fiddle.

In today’s Canada, there is deception, national in scope, coming directly from the right‑wing opposition benches in Ottawa. In 2023, the populist Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre adopted “Axe the tax” as his new mantra and has shaped his federal election campaign around that hackneyed rhyme.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 days ago

      And their customers (e.g. manufacturers, transportation providers) factor in both those price hikes and the carbon taxes that they themselves need to pay, and pass those costs on to their customers, and so forth until finally end consumers are paying for several rounds of carbon tax that’s priced into more expensive goods and services.

      In many cases, there’s nowhere for market forces to displace the inefficiency, so things just get more expensive without changing supply chains much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s fine. It encourages everyone to stop carbon

      The point of the carbon tax is to stop carbon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        42 days ago

        But it doesnt work. Grocery stores raise their prices to cover the carbon tax on deliveries, and the consumers pay more. Its not like we can choose to buy only bananas that were delivered by an electric truck.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12 days ago

          If it costs you $30 to buy a banana delivered by fossil fuels and $1 to buy a banana that was delivered by sail boat, which would you buy?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I have neither option option. All bananas are delivered to my landlocked town via the same truck.

            Bananas are probably a bad example because they are so perishable. They have to be transported in a very controlled environment. Theres no way youre getting bananas from Guatamala to Canada via sailboat and still having them be saleable.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 days ago

            Uhh I dunno if there’s any salvaging that hypothetical, lol… But if bananas start costing $1 each, we’re in trouble.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 days ago

              Things that arent local and are produced with unfair labor must go up in price when those systemic issues are resolved.

      • @Mushroomm
        link
        4
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        No…it let’s the large companies continue to pollute while passing the penalty off to those who can’t afford to move the needle even slightly. This needed protections against this before the tax was levied but good fuckin luck getting legislation against Canada’s ogliarchs that actually effect their bottom line