• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    11 day ago

    You are right, but a lot of the roots of furry criticism do tend to be queerphobic in origin. It’s just something to recognize.

    I’m using kink in a pretty generic way because a lot of the criticisms of furries relate to sex (e.g. beastiality or pedophilia), and thus any depiction of kink (like bondage gear) is used to demonize them that it’s a fetish (and one that is coming for your children.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 day ago

      That might be fair in some contexts but I think most people would only make any connection to beastiality, which is probably fair, no? The whole thing is dressing up like an animal and it’s confusing for most people who don’t do it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 day ago

        A furry is someone that identifies with anthropomorphic animal characters (or sometimes just animal characteristics). No dressing up required. Now, a lot of the people that go to cons tend to have more money, so you will see more fursuits and such, but most furries do not dress up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 day ago

          TIL. I first heard of furries like 10 years ago and hadn’t ever known this. I thought the entire thing was dressing up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            31 day ago

            I used to as well until I looked into it, which is why I now know way, way more than anyone really needs to (there is… a lot.) Anyway, figured I’d explain just in case. You didn’t seem like you had bad intentions, so thanks for being understanding.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 day ago

              Thanks for the info. I do appreciate the assumption that I was coming in good faith. So often people assume the opposite based on one comment that they misunderstand!