(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 hours agocontempt of rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1237arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1235arrow-down1imagecontempt of rulelemmy.blahaj.zone(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 hours agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-text
minus-square[email protected]linkfedilinkarrow-up12·4 hours agoSome cheaper brands, which are subsidized via ads, actively search for unsecured networks. Disabling the Wi-Fi as completely as possible might be worth the time, if you have such a model.
minus-squareKowowow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 hours agoIf it’s aggressive enough might have to damage what it uses for an antenna
Some cheaper brands, which are subsidized via ads, actively search for unsecured networks. Disabling the Wi-Fi as completely as possible might be worth the time, if you have such a model.
If it’s aggressive enough might have to damage what it uses for an antenna