Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they’d have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

  • iAmTheTotOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bad faith? The only faith I have is in the rules as they are written, like a gospel!

    • TheMarchioness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s why when she gave you four arguments that should clear the matter up, you cherry-picked one of them and said that it was “making an assumption” and therefore invalid, even though the “assumption” was that the player understood language. That’s why you ignored the other three arguments entirely.

      You’re deliberately trolling for attention. and this faux-innocence isn’t fooling anyone.

      • iAmTheTotOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I haven’t ignored anything intentionally, if I haven’t addressed a supposed claim to why this isn’t RAW it’s because it was added in an edit after I replied.

        (psssst, read the first line of the OP)

          • papalonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            This reads like someone in the comments of an Onion article mad that someone would spread false information.

            It’s a joke, g. Throw some dice and make up some bullshit RAW of your own, it’s fun.

              • iAmTheTotOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                OP: this is purposefully obtuse Other people: engages with OP OP: is purposefully obtuse Other people: shockedpickachu.png

    • macmacfire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The argument here should be “yes,” as arguing according to the rules is arguing in bad faith. That’s the point of the post lel.