• Pika
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Dude the precident it would set if Delta sued Microsoft and won would be super damaging I’m glad it’s not happening

    Imagine being responsible for a software that is put on A system that you developed, with you being isolated/removed from the situation, it would be the content owners of websites being responsible for Stuff posted all over again

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Imagine being responsible for forcing a security update on your customers without testing it.

      Negligence absolutely applies here, Crowdstrike needs to be sued out of existence.

      • Pika
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fully agreed that crowdstrike is partly responsible, however my comment was based off of Microsoft not crowdstrike. Delta stated they were going to sue both crowdstrike and Microsoft, but they didn’t actually go through with it

        • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I am less certain about Microsoft, though I think they need to have their ass handed to them for their high-handed treatment of push patches.

          Either they need to implement staggered deployment by default, or they need to get out of the update deployment business altogether if they don’t want the liability, can’t have it both ways.

          We know this didn’t happen, because CS.