• nehal3m
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    They were all right though, if by ‘the world’ you mean ‘the world as we know it’.

    • Knuk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair that’s valid today too. The world as we know it is ending but maybe there’ll be some mad max style pockets of civilization after

      • nehal3m
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Or maybe it’s just the ‘we’ that’s going to be out of the equation, which is fine too I guess. Our particular form of life just isn’t that important in the grand scheme of things anyway.

        • el_abuelo@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Actually we are important. We have single handedly exterminated more life than any other species. We are now on the same scale of importance as the dinosaur ending asteroid.

          I wish we weren’t. But we are.

          Our demise can’t come soon enough.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course, when you change into “the world as we know it”, it was already “destroyed” several times in recent history by things like cars and the internet…