• Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    He describes the plight of these people correctly, and while they haven’t been offered enough by the dems, they aren’t choosing the republicans because they are offering them more. They’re choosing them because they fear change and the Republicans promise to protect them from change. The fear comes from ignorance / lack of a decent rural education system.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not American, but I saw it as the opposite: that US voters are sick of the status quo. They want a radical change candidate who’ll shake things up. They want anything but business-as-usual.

      Not to discount stupidity and racism. There’s that too, but I have to hope it’s mostly borne out of fear.

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, that is a very weird position to hold, the status quo is shit for me but I don’t want change. Not disagreeing with you though that it is that way.

      • Imgonnatrythis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        People are pretty good at adapting to even pretty lousy conditions if a steady-state can be maintained. We all have very strong loss aversion though. You can capitalize on the most extreme versions on this in populations that don’t have a loss buffer, lack diverse skillsets , and have had limited exposure to diversity of any sort. Tell them someone that looks different than them is going to change the food they eat, build a different place of worship next to their church, and take their jobs away from them by working for much less and you’ve got an effective boogeyman that you can promise to defend them from (while stealing from them even). Hell, it works so damn well you can tell them that these boogie men will eat their pets and they will take you seriously.