• Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Yes you have, and yes it is in the context of what you’re defending.

    it’s good that you have faith in people to misunderstand what you’ve written for what you have come to assert you mean.

    “…in such a jocular setting.”

    The jocular context of punitive global genocide based on reasoning you and other commenters find “actually” sound.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I mean, supported in the personal belief sense. I can assure you that it was never intended, even if that was accidentally conveyed.

      Natural language is inherently imprecise. It only works because there’s shared background to interpret it on.

      Dark humour is a thing, you’ll see it everywhere on the internet - I’m sure you know that. This is no exception.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        there is not much of a joke here.

        cthulhu decides to commit indiscriminate genocide because of humanity’s violent acts.

        a human agrees.

        that is the comic.

        because cynicism is hip and internet comments are supposed to be edgy rather than thoughtful, people are defending genocide without understanding what they are agreeing with, as you have.

        most people don’t realize what they’re doing, but you and the other commenters are nodding along with the non-joke that everybody should be killed because humanity has problems.

        that’s not a joke, that’s irresponsible defeatist anxiety.

        I prefer to rage against the dying of the light.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          The joke is that Cthulhu is usually unreasonable (at least by human standards), but is able to logically explain himself to the satisfaction of the human shown. This is unexpected.

          I’ll leave you with this: cynicism is hip, but it’s exactly as irrational to start with optimism. You’ve got to start with what is, and what ought to be and work from there.

          • Varyk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 minutes ago

            that’s not the joke.

            “cynicism is hip, but it’s exactly as irrational to start with optimism.”

            being cynical doesn’t help anyone or anything. being optimistic does help things.

            “You’ve got to start with what is, and what ought to be and work from there.”

            this is what I do.

            you and the others defending “reasonable” genocide is not working toward what “ought to be”, unless you believe that what “ought to be” is giving up on life or some drastic action like global genocide (which is also giving up)

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 minute ago

              Existential comics is a humour series. I disagree, it’s a joke.

              If that’s what you do, good for you. For every few dark jokes there’s someone posting “orphan crushing machine” style glurg. Optimism in the face of horrors or no hope is just unhealthy denial.

              I was not trying to fix the world with that post, I agree. Sometimes I do write something that helps someone, though. IRL I do a bunch of volunteer work.