(FYI - the article that the guy is replying to is misinformation. Two commenters have provided snopes links for anyone curious.)

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Well, there’s nothing you can point to in what I wrote that implies anything about intent so I’d say your disagreement is pretty objectively wrong.

      • Rekorse
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think you dont know what objective means.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          If you just say “I disagree” while having absolutely no grounds for that disagreement then you’re objectively wrong.

          • Rekorse
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I dont think you know what objective means.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I think you’re asserting something with no basis again, making you objectively wrong about that too lmao.

              • Rekorse
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Well as long as you are getting something out of this then thats a win in my books.