It would be easier to find this credible if the names weren’t censored. As it stands there is, literally no way to fact check any of this. Screenshots are very easy to fake.
Do I find it believable? Absolutely. But propaganda is most effective when it tells you something you’re ready to believe. You haven’t even told us the new of this “pro-child-abuse group.” Some kindof corroborating details are needed here.
" there is, literally no way to fact check any of this."
You could just read the bill?
There is nothing about sports in the hill, or touching. The good faith section is about protecting persons who recommend, or not, council before parental notification.
Edit: this doesn’t mean I support the bill. It even makes sex Ed opt-in except for religious schools…
It would be easier to find this credible if the names weren’t censored. As it stands there is, literally no way to fact check any of this. Screenshots are very easy to fake.
Do I find it believable? Absolutely. But propaganda is most effective when it tells you something you’re ready to believe. You haven’t even told us the new of this “pro-child-abuse group.” Some kindof corroborating details are needed here.
I’m not sure why we’re censoring these names to begin with. It’s not like Facebook posts come with any reasonable expectation of privacy.
“Taddle tale”
I don’t know, it checks out
" there is, literally no way to fact check any of this."
You could just read the bill?
There is nothing about sports in the hill, or touching. The good faith section is about protecting persons who recommend, or not, council before parental notification.
Edit: this doesn’t mean I support the bill. It even makes sex Ed opt-in except for religious schools…
That’s not the part I’m talking about fact checking. I’m well aware of how awful the UCP is.