I’m currently making my way through FO3 and I haven’t even discovered half of all the POI and I’ve been playing for months. NV piques my interest, because the story telling in FO3 is great, weapon durability aside.
Give NV a try. I don’t think there’s any reason to make sure to finish FO3 first (spoiler-wise), and you might end up liking it more.
They’re both decent, but pretty long, so playing both back to back would be way too much Bethesda-jank for most people (though NV is def better, it is the same engine).
If I had to choose one, it would be NV every time.
I wouldn’t call it shit, but yean NV is definitely a much better game.
I’m currently making my way through FO3 and I haven’t even discovered half of all the POI and I’ve been playing for months. NV piques my interest, because the story telling in FO3 is great, weapon durability aside.
Give NV a try. I don’t think there’s any reason to make sure to finish FO3 first (spoiler-wise), and you might end up liking it more.
They’re both decent, but pretty long, so playing both back to back would be way too much Bethesda-jank for most people (though NV is def better, it is the same engine).
If I had to choose one, it would be NV every time.