Don’t confuse “post-Marxist understanding” with “being a Marxist.”
Marx defined and described an ontology that even his opponents use as tools to describe the economy - but it wouldn’t make sense to call opponents of Marx as ‘Marxists’ would it?
Just examining flaws in and of itself isn’t socialism, although arguably saying capitalism has no flaws is pro-capitalist.
Don’t confuse “post-Marxist understanding” with “being a Marxist.”
Marx defined and described an ontology that even his opponents use as tools to describe the economy - but it wouldn’t make sense to call opponents of Marx as ‘Marxists’ would it?
Just examining flaws in and of itself isn’t socialism, although arguably saying capitalism has no flaws is pro-capitalist.