It’ll cost $9 each time. They’re raising money for the mass transit system by charging specifically those people who don’t use the mass transit system and that feels really unfair to me.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Right?! I know several people in Manhattan (who are pretty well off tbh), and even they don’t own a car. Why would you in Manhattan?!? How privileged does this person have to be? People are unable to afford groceries right now and they’re complaining that they might have to pay a few bucks because they don’t want to take a train

        • ArbitraryValueOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          34
          ·
          3 days ago

          Those people who can’t afford groceries shouldn’t be complaining either. After all, they’re not literally starving and there are starving children in Africa…

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            “Starving children in Africa”

            That is a such a classic argument, too bad it is completely idiotic.

            A starving child in Africa would not be helped by sending our food scraps to them, the food would spoil and harm them instead. If the food did make it to Africa without spoiling, it would rightfully be rejected, as an insult to the government and people of these nations.

            But let’s say that the food didn’t spoil and was accepted, it would ruin the local economy. The food would be cheaper than the locally available food, driving farmers out of business, increasing the dependency on food scraps.

            Never make that argument in this context, it just shows how dumb you are.

    • Teanut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      I did notice this news article that mentions:

      New Yorkers who live within the Congestion Relief Zone will not be charged to drive or park around the area. They will only be charged once they leave and cross back into the zone.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not familiar with NYC, but isn’t this exactly the opposite of their goals? If you are staying within the congestion zone, you should be taking a different form of transportation. It’s only when leaving that area that you have a (potentially) valid reason to take your own car.

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Most congestion pricing schemes rely only on tolling the boundary and generally target central business districts with little internal traffic. The technology is there to install more internal tracking of traffic, but you’d probably push up against privacy groups and the deployment of the tech would be a lot more expensive.