• Atomic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ah yes. Now I’m a racist as well. What do you base that on exactly?

    If you think they’ve never tested the stealth capabilities of the f35 you’re delusional.

    You got absolutely nothing in terms of knowledge on the subject, which is why you resort to personal attacks and throw in the occasional “no u” to derail the discussion into a match of name calling. You follow the same pattern every time.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah yes. Now I’m a racist as well. What do you base that on exactly?

      I base that on your religious belief in western superiority.

      If you think they’ve never tested the stealth capabilities of the f35 you’re delusional.

      I know they’ve never tested capabilities of f35 because it’s never been used in combat against a peer competitor. The fact that you don’t understand this shows that you are in fact the one who got absolutely nothing in terms of knowledge on the subject, and are incapable of rational thought in general.

      You got absolutely nothing in terms of knowledge on the subject, which is why you resort to personal attacks and throw in the occasional “no u” to derail the discussion into a match of name calling. You follow the same pattern every time.

      I love how you keep making ad hominem attacks here to distract from your utter ignorance.

      • Atomic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        My religious beliefs? I don’t have any. Nor have i stated anything about certain people being superior over anyone else.

        You’re right, the f35 has not been performing strikes against Eastern nations directly. That doesn’t mean it has never been tested. They’re sold to various countries in Europe and each and every nation does test their capabilities with their own systems. Each of their neighbours take every oppertunity to test their capabilities as well. Everyone has come to the same conclusion. The ram capabilities of the f35 is mighty impressive.

        You’ve displayed your lack of insight into each and every aspect enough as it is.

        And addressing your childish game of name calling isn’t an ad hominem attack. But it is funny you mention that, seeing how you unprovoked, resort to personal attacks. The comment-chain is there to read for everyone. You’re the only one between us making personal attacks.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Here’s what an actual battle test platform looks like:

          The Russian Air Force has demonstrated high confidence in the Su-57’s stealth capabilities, and has deployed the fighters for high intensity combat operations to parts of the Ukrainian theatre with particularly high concentrations of Ukrainian air defences.

          The Su-57 program has prioritised reducing maintenance needs and operational costs to avoid the very low availability rates that have plagued America’s F-117, F-22 and F-35 stealth fighter fleets. One notable means by which this had been achieved is through reduced reliance on radar absorbent coatings, which was achieved by using innovative solutions such as radar absorbent fibreglass. In contrast to American stealth fighters which consistently cost far more to operate than their fourth generation predecessors, this approach allows the Su-57 to potentially achieve lower operational costs than its direct predecessor the Soviet Su-27, thus allowing Russia to move its fleet into the fifth generation without either significantly raising sustainment funding or contracting the number of fighters in service.

          https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/first-look-stealth-optimised-al51f-1-powering-russia-su-57m

          You’ve displayed your lack of insight into each and every aspect enough as it is.

          And addressing your childish game of name calling isn’t an ad hominem attack.

          I see you don’t know what ad hominem means. Ad hominem isn’t a personal attack, it’s a way to deflect from the point being made. You’re trying to discredit what I’m saying by claiming that I don’t know what I’m talking about. You’re not providing counter points, but instead attacking me to deflect because at the end of the day you’rej ust a troll.

          In any case, I’ve said all I needed to say here. You can keep on bleating if you like though. Bye.