Summary
Chief Justice John Roberts’ year-end report controversially likened modern judges facing criticism to civil rights-era judges who dismantled Jim Crow laws.
Critics argue this comparison is inaccurate, noting civil rights judges like Julius Waties Waring faced violence, ostracism, and genuine threats while fighting systemic racism.
Roberts’ framing, alongside similar claims by Justice Alito comparing the Dobbs decision to Brown v. Board, is seen as an attempt to co-opt the heroism of civil rights champions.
Critics contend this effort aims to deflect critiques of today’s judicial decisions, which differ starkly in context and purpose.
He does care and with facists in charge he’ll be portrayed as a wonderful helpful man. He doesn’t care what people say right now because history is written by the victors…and right now the facists are winning.