• Universal MonkOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Without proof though

    I don’t need proof, because I believe him. And I have a feeling, even if he did provide proof, you’d be quick to say stuff like, “Well of course that’s easy to fake…” :)

    • Jiggle_Physics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      No, if he had a record of the call/meeting. If there is an uninvested third party witness, etc. then I will take the claims seriously. Like I said, I do not doubt that the Biden admin, or any other presidential administration, has exercised undue influence over the media. It is indisputable that there is a history of it. However, I still want evidence before I go any further than “given the history, it could be true”.

      I do not operate on faith, and you should not either, even though you will continue to do so. You also should probably drop the shit tier rags you post all the time, like the daily mail. If something is out there, a better outlet will have it.

      • Universal MonkOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        You also should probably drop the shit tier rags you post all the time, like the daily mail

        I like the Daily Mail. Thanks! :)

        • Jiggle_Physics
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I mean, that is obvious, you post them frequently. Garbage in, garbage out.

                • Jiggle_Physics
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Posting garbage simply because it shits on the party they have a deep bias against, doesn’t mean you are actually countering some narrative, garbage is garbage, be it pro democrat, pro gop, whatever.

                  The daily mail, NY Post, The militant. This makes up most of what you have been posting. daily, and post, are barely outside of being tabloids. While I have some respect for the SWP, and generally support them because there is so little actual leftist stuff in the US, the militant has a history of posting unsourced claims, straight up stuff that is wrong, and, while I can understand the desire for anonymity for the owners of a leftist circulation in the US, the lack of transparency is always suspect. While you can’t really just trust news, you can at least not primarily post the bottom feeders.

                  Also, your profile just screams martyr complex

                  • Universal MonkOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    The daily mail, NY Post, The militant.

                    I like those. :)

                    Also, your profile just screams martyr complex

                    Not at all, it’s showing how I’m still here in spite of all who have tried to silence me. See, the beauty of the fediverse, is multiple instances, usernames, etc. No one person, or group of people, can silence anyone.

                    You are totally free to block me and/or this community if you don’t like what I post. Thanks, friend!