Both were live service; one at Bend, one at Bluepoint. Bluepoint was helping work on God of War: Ragnarok until 2022, at which point they were developing this now-cancelled God of War live service game.

  • dindonmasker
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The game they killed 3 days after release might have been good but i haven’t seen a single gameplay video or have any idea of what the game was about. Are they that scared of releasing a shit game and keeping it playable but dead for a while?

      • dindonmasker
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean, they spent what 400 millions on developing it and they won’t spend 10k - 100k to keep that game running for a while? Like “NO NOT A SINGLE CENT MORE SPENT ON THAT SHIT GAME!” XD

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They were shoveling money down the tube for a game that you literally couldn’t play due to how few people there were.

        • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Well, yeah. If it’s clearly never going to recover, why keep spending money on it? They already took it as a total loss by refunding everyone, so that was probably cheaper than holding out for a recovery that wasn’t going to happen.

          • afansfw@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Valve tried holding out on a failed game with Artifact, and git 0 return on investment, even after revamping it.

            Still, Concord seemed kind of interesting with how ambitious it all was. I wonder if they could have pushed it off the ground with some redesigns

            • ampersandrew@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I don’t know what the market at large wants, but I suspect its failure is based at least in part on the fact that the purchase has zero value if other people don’t also value it, so the customer is now more reserved with their time and money unless a game seems like it’s going to take off, which would theoretically make nearly every a game a huge success or total failure. What I want is for a scalable multiplayer shooter that gracefully handles 1-X players, and I hardly care what X is as long as it’s more than 3. Let me host it on a LAN and play split-screen, and give me a deathmatch mode, among other things. We used to get this kind of shooter all the time, and now I’m starving for one, to the point that I’d happily have picked up Concord if it was that game, even with its wonky-ass character designs.