• sbv
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Having an architecture that locks communities to an instance is a problem. They should be distributed across the network with no notion of a home instance.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        Moderation is also just an event in the protocol, just like votes or comments. Your instance would simply have to aggregate all those events, just like the current “home instances” do for their communities.

      • Mojave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Probably better than whatever batshit moderation happens right now on the tankie instances

      • danhab99@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It would be different. The end-user would have to moderate their feeds, they’d have to find the same community provided by platform hosts who align with the users moderation values, or be ok with hiding content themselves.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They still to be attached to an instance at the protocol level. Or you have instances which are barely network components rather than communities, but that’s not what ActivityPub is about

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        And that’s a problem.

        However, there’s nothing stopping a developer from extending the protocol to support it. You can essentially throw a message into the fediverse with more or less arbitrary payloads. Adding something like a feed/community identifier is not impossible.