• sbv
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Having an architecture that locks communities to an instance is a problem. They should be distributed across the network with no notion of a home instance.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Moderation is also just an event in the protocol, just like votes or comments. Your instance would simply have to aggregate all those events, just like the current “home instances” do for their communities.

      • Mojave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Probably better than whatever batshit moderation happens right now on the tankie instances

      • danhab99@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It would be different. The end-user would have to moderate their feeds, they’d have to find the same community provided by platform hosts who align with the users moderation values, or be ok with hiding content themselves.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The end-user would have to moderate their feeds

          Ah yes, I love a feed where I have to view and delete the alt-right trolls and CSAM myself.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          PieFed (the non-tankie Lemmy alternative written in Python rather than Rust) allows for that. Atm it’s fairly primitive unless you make your own instance but ultimately it democratizes the moderation process to allow the end user what they want to see or not. Like instead of “remove” or “allow” content, it can automatically be “collapsed” with an option to uncollapse it whenever someone chooses. And/or labels can be placed next to usernames - like “<2 week old account” or “has 10x more downvotes than upvotes” - except it is actually icons that are used rather than such long phrases. You can put custom icons of any type next to any individual user that you want, for any reason - e.g. to help their comments stand out as you scroll, or to remind you to be careful replying, or whatever custom reason you chose to remind yourself of.

          Edit: and all that I’ve said here is already available. So I guess it’s not so primitive after all, especially when keyword filters get added (new features appear all the time - it being in Python makes its development cycle FAST!), but what I meant is that even more is planned, to further reduce the manual burden of moderation efforts. Also, the entire sidebar appears below every single post, unlike in some apps where it it quite buried behind several clicks. It’s not fully ready for the masses yet but it’s coming along nicely, and already has several features that Lemmy lacks (and vice versa unfortunately).

          Edit 2: based on db0’s comment, I should mention that PieFed also has Mastodon style tags too, on top of not only communities but on top of that too there are Categories of Communities. This is getting confusing to describe so just look at this example - the hierarchy above the post shows the Categories, the tags are below it, and the YouTube link is natively embedded in between.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They still to be attached to an instance at the protocol level. Or you have instances which are barely network components rather than communities, but that’s not what ActivityPub is about

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And that’s a problem.

        However, there’s nothing stopping a developer from extending the protocol to support it. You can essentially throw a message into the fediverse with more or less arbitrary payloads. Adding something like a feed/community identifier is not impossible.