Yes it was. Up to 10 hours on most days is nowhere even close to debunking the myth of unreliability, if anything it’s proof of unreliability. We need to transition to renewables but this blind boosterism and denial of reality is the exact opposite of helpful.
We need to transition to renewables but this blind boosterism and denial of reality is the exact opposite of helpful.
I did find an article that says “proves renewables are reliable” from data. We agree that we need transition, maybe agree that they can be reliable. US/California pace is in fact significantly deficient. OP was attacking underlying achievements rather than any “boosterism headline” in post here, and what seems harsh.
![Understanding statistics and calling out reporting bias is a bannable offence on [email protected]](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e205471c-3021-44eb-9e17-016c3e5b5088.png){kind=link}
Yes it was. Up to 10 hours on most days is nowhere even close to debunking the myth of unreliability, if anything it’s proof of unreliability. We need to transition to renewables but this blind boosterism and denial of reality is the exact opposite of helpful.
I did find an article that says “proves renewables are reliable” from data. We agree that we need transition, maybe agree that they can be reliable. US/California pace is in fact significantly deficient. OP was attacking underlying achievements rather than any “boosterism headline” in post here, and what seems harsh.