• Tiger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmm, even developing countries with local livestock and organic feed for them it’s still a lot better for the environment to be vegetarian or vegan, by far. It’s always more efficient to be more plant-based, rather than growing plants for animals to eat and then eating those animals.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I really need to do the calculations here.

      Because growing plants for animals do not have, by far, the same cost that growing plants for humans.

      My grandparents grew lucerne for livestock. And it really doesn’t take much to grow. While crops for humans tend to take mucho more water and energy.

      And for some animals, like chickens, you can just use residues from other crops.

      I don’t think it’s that straightforward.

      My grandparents used to live in an old village, with their farm, and that wasn’t a very contaminating lifestyle. But if they would want to became began they would have needed to import goods from across the globe to have a healthy diet.