• TacoButtPlugOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Oh. Sorry. I thought it was good to be able to both have farming land and solar power. Sorry for missing the mark.

    • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How would this not reduce crop yields? Mathematically it is impossible, plenty of roofs and other things to put the solar panels on.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        Plants don’t necessarily need as much sunlight as they get. More tends to be wasted and drys them out (thus wasting water). Growing in shade is actually better for many types of plants.

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          You ah ever grow any plants? You ever work at a green house? You ever stick veggies up your ass or just keep your opinions up there? We are talking about feeding nations not your half dead lavender on the patio of your north facing apartment.

      • Mouselemming
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Because "In Denmark, it is common for trees, wooden fences and even plastic sheets to act as windbreaks for crops. “We thought, if we are going to do this, why not make these wind shelters produce electricity?” says Victoria.

        In other words, the solar panels aren’t taking away any crop space that wasn’t already taken for windbreaks.

        If you’re used to a giant field of wheat with no protection from wind, it’s a different equation. (With climate change, possibly a Dust Bowl waiting to happen, but that’s another story.)

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I ain’t a farmer but I seen enough corn fields endless miles acres and acres. Same fields some years with soybeans. We don’t put up sheets or windbreaks lol.

          • Mouselemming
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            I don’t think the project was aimed at Iowa or Kansas. For one thing, they’re tornado country. You’d need to be able to retract the panels into the ground like missile silos or a 007-villain’s evil lair.

      • RvTV95XBeo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Not all crops need 100% sun exposure in 100% of their growing regions.

        Many crops do better with a little bit of well placed shading to help keep temperatures/sun damage down.

        The way these panels are oriented they may also reduce wind flow over the crops which can improve water retention (but may lead to other problems if crops are over-irrigated).

        Mathematically it’s entirely possible to have better crop yield than a vast expanse of monocrops devoid of shelter.