joel1974@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agoWhy I am not impressed by A.I.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down144
arrow-up1133arrow-down1imageWhy I am not impressed by A.I.lemmy.worldjoel1974@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareGrandwolf319linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·5 hours ago If you think of LLMs as something with actual intelligence you’re going to be very unimpressed Artificial sugar is still sugar. Artificial intelligence implies there is intelligence in some shape or form.
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours ago Artificial sugar is still sugar. Because it contains sucrose, fructose or glucose? Because it metabolises the same and matches the glycemic index of sugar? Because those are all wrong. What’s your criteria?
minus-squareJohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 hours agoSomething that pretends or looks like intelligence, but actually isn’t at all is a perfectly valid interpretation of the word artificial - fake intelligence.
Artificial sugar is still sugar.
Artificial intelligence implies there is intelligence in some shape or form.
Because it contains sucrose, fructose or glucose? Because it metabolises the same and matches the glycemic index of sugar?
Because those are all wrong. What’s your criteria?
Something that pretends or looks like intelligence, but actually isn’t at all is a perfectly valid interpretation of the word artificial - fake intelligence.