• Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, I feel like there’d be a lot of salvageable material that could be put to better use. Even if it’s all rusted and broken down, a ship that size has a lot of steel that could be repurposed.

      • CHOPSTEEQ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 months ago

        On the one hand yes. But, and this is a big but, typically when ships are sunk by the government, a lot of environmental impact studies and decontamination processes are preformed. The goal is usually to create artificial reefs, which is pretty useful because of how much damage we’ve done to the natural habitats.

        Does it balance out, or make up for it? I don’t know, I’m not smart enough. But I do know the artificial reef projects are greatly appreciated and highly desired by local governments.

        • filcuk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          Also, shipbreaking is really dirty, dangerous, and expensive, typically being outsourced to some 3rd world country.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They spend a lot to decommission the ships and make them safe. It’s just cheaper to buy an old ship and clean it up than to buy a similar amount of other artificial reef materials.

          Also, being ships in shallow water, it drives scuba diving tourists as well as creating new locations for recreational fishing.

          They’re pretty big boons for the local towns.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          They’re usually sank in areas that are otherwise uninhabited by corals due to the depth of the water. The wrecks provide surfaces in the light zone which allows corals to grow.

          It’s entirely new habitat and it provides more breeding sites in the area. Even if it takes wildlife from other areas, the decrease in population in those results in higher breeding rates in those locations due to decreased competition for food and breeding sites. More breeding sites = more breeding and a higher overall population of wildlife over time.

          Ecology aside, these sites draw a lot of tourism. They’re “shipwrecks” that are in shallow water, often shallow enough that you can experience them while scuba diving, without needing decompression stops. This means that scuba divers can experience wreck diving without the extra complexity of decompression.

          There are many of these artificial reefs around Florida and they’re very popular dive sites in areas that otherwise would have no similar attractions.

          Source: Dated a woman who worked at fish and wildlife, department of marine fisheries and attended the sinking of the Oriskany ( https://www.padi.com/dive-site/united-states-of-america-usa/uss-oriskany/#overview )

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anything you dump down there becomes the environment for whatever’s down there.

        That’s what an environment is.

    • whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve always kinda wondered what happens once the salt water breaks down the metal and paint, can’t be great for the local ecology

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        If you think the paint contamination after decommissioning is bad, just wait 'til you find out about how antifouling bottom paint (whether hard copper-based or ablative) works during the service life of the ship, by design.