misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square275fedilinkarrow-up1645arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1635arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square275fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squaregravitas_deficiencylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-squareenumerator4829linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-squaregravitas_deficiencylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?