• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Agreed, but I would use tariffs as a form of carbon tax on countries w/o sufficient climate policies. Individual companies/products could reduce the tariff by proving how much pollution is actually produced.

    I suppose you could extend that to other negative externalities we want to control for as well.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Great use for them. If the reason it’s cheaper is that they aren’t paying the externalities, then adding a tariff is a great way to compensate for that.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or tariffs on countries with terrible labour policies. It’s always annoyed me that labour is never involved in free trade negotiations and the stuff that makes it in are requirements for standardisation or intellectual property, but never anything about labour standards.

      Of course, that’s by design, because all of those things are neoliberal constructs and the whole point of those is to break labour power, but it’s disappointing you never even see anyone pay lip service to anything like that.

      • Klear
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Did you not read the first comment in this thread? It talks about just this.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I thought I was adding to the conversation by mentioning free trade agreements, but ok.