Eg you create art to cope with depression, so your depression created all your art and it’s actually not yours. And if it’s popular or successful, your depression is talented and successful, not you.
Eg you create art to cope with depression, so your depression created all your art and it’s actually not yours. And if it’s popular or successful, your depression is talented and successful, not you.
I’m not, actually. Just wondering why crediting a disorder for creating anything is normalized to the point you’re the problem for wanting to be credited for your own work and be seen as more than a disorder.
It’s such a stupid argument, tell me about it. Could you imagine your disorder creating all your art and accomplishing everything you’ve done? Who would want to be seen as a corpse animated by a disorder?
But all of the entire world will blindly agree if that disorder was the stupid puzzle piece one. No questions asked, that shit made all your art and you should be proud of being a vessel for a disorder that controls everything about you.
You need to provide more context.
If this happened to you, you encountered a shitty person.
You’re supposed to be proud of being nothing more than that stupid puzzle piece. Your only value to society is proving that puzzle piece could accomplish things, and your only purpose is to solicit donations to “non profits” out of pity. And you’re supposed to be proud of it.
Literally everyone I’ve encountered before changing my name and cutting that stupid puzzle piece out of my life despite being fucking misdiagnosed reduced me to that shit. And if everyone’s a shitty person then you’re the shitty person.
That seems like a VERY different issue than you’re asking in the OP and the internet won’t be able to help you with that.
Yeah they’ll only be able to help contribute to the issue by posting misinformation on social media, literally saying that stupid disorder made them create art and without it they’d be nothing.
I used depression as an example to point out how unfair and stupid it is.