Former President Donald Trump was indicted for an unprecedented third time on August 1, adding another set of serious federal charges to the mounting legal issues he faces.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    7211 months ago

    Even after he is behind bars. Crazy as it sounds, he can run for President from prison.

    Not very effectively, but he can run.

    • WalrusDragonOnABike
      link
      fedilink
      2411 months ago

      One presidential candidate got 3.4% (more than all 3rd party candidates in 2020 combined) of the vote (over 1million votes) as a third party candidate while in prison in 1920.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          fedilink
          911 months ago

          One of the few upsides of my living in Terre Haute, Indiana is that I can say I live in the same town Debs was from. They have a nice museum here dedicated to him in his former home. If you’re passing through Indiana, I do recommend an hour or two to see it. Bernie Sanders made sure to stop there during his 2016 campaign, if you need an endorsement.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            FDR gets all the credit but without actual leftists like Debs (and all the workers who fought in solidarity with him) we’d still be sending our kids to work instead of school.

            That’s who this is.

            Bernie has his picture hanging on his office wall and he’s basically Bernie’s hero.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              511 months ago

              we’d still be sending our kids to work instead of school.

              We are. They’re letting 14 year olds bar tend in Wisconsin and McDonalds in Arkansas has been busted for employing 12 year olds. Several states are actively bringing back child labor.

        • Chainweasel
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It makes sense though. Think about it like this, A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges. Trump could have placed a more loyal attorney general, nailed Biden on some bullshit petty offense that technically qualifies as a felony, and have his name removed from the ballot shortly before the election. Allowing felons to run for president defangs that particular power move. To disqualify someone the 14th amendment would have to be invoked, and should be in Trump’s case.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            311 months ago

            A politician that wanted to stay in power could disqualify his opponents by wielding the DOJ as a personal tool and nailing them with felony charges

            It’s how Putin and other despots have been doing it for a very long time.

          • Coelacanth
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            While I do see the validity of this argument, it still feels like treating the symptoms rather than the cause. If the fear is a sitting president welding his personal power to imprison (and thus disqualify) a political rival, isn’t the bigger problem that a sitting president has the power to do this in the first place?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              The Justice Department has to be able to indict people, that’s part of its function. And the DoJ is part of the executive branch. A good President will not use the DoJ for his personal political purposes, but the incentive to do so, if it was there, would be extremely powerful. I think it’s probably a good idea to remove it. If the people can’t be trusted not to vote for a criminal or a traitor, we have bigger problems.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I’ve heard the logic is to prevent people from wanting to retroactively legalize shit to secure votes from felons, which doesn’t make a lot of sense tbh

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1711 months ago

      Weird. I’ve heard of Americans losing their right to vote when imprisoned and yet they could run for office?

      • @vaultdweller013
        link
        311 months ago

        Probably just an overlooked aspect, it woulf be too much of a pain to run for office while im prison. Even for a lot of the rich and powerful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3011 months ago

        If he wins, he pardons himself from federal crimes then uses his powers as Commander in Chief to break himself out of prison for state crimes, thereby creating the ultimate constitutional crisis and tearing the country apart.

        • BarqsHasBite
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Whether or not he can pardon himself is up for debate. So if the founding fathers intended that you can assume office from prison there would be a more defined method.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3611 months ago

            Or we need to admit that the founding fathers may not have predicted literally every possible circumstance to arise in the future hundreds of years.

            • BarqsHasBite
              link
              fedilink
              -211 months ago

              This isn’t a new modern invention. The election process is pretty well defined.

          • @[email protected]
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            1011 months ago

            It was intentional that you can run and be elected as president from prison. It’s written about contemporaneously. They knew the risk of allowing a president, or administration, jailing their political opponents.

            What’s not clear is if it was meant for a president to be able to pardon themselves. I personally would think not, but many think it’s permissable.