German media outlets Süddeutsche Zeitung, WDR, and NDR also cite the report, noting that Russian President Vladimir Putin appears intent on testing NATO’s Article 5 guarantees. The alliance’s mutual defence clause obliges member states to come to one another’s aid if attacked. The assessment suggests Putin may seek to challenge how seriously that commitment would be honoured.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some military spending is good since you might actually have to, you know, defend your country.

      • indexBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        Germany alone is already spending 66 billions a year in “defense”. If they were spending 120 billions and the government would said “we need more” you would drink it arguing that some military spending is good.

        We are already all armed to the teeth and waging wars against each others. The same governments increasing the “defense” budget to defend us from evil russia are backing israel in a genocide, no government here has really good intentions.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Germany has been seriously underspending for decades. It’s gonna take a lot of money to get them to any sort of level where they’d have a credible defence.

          • indexBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 months ago

            Removed by mod

            • Gladaed@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You should measure expenses in bullets, shells and bombs. Not in who managed to pay the most money for them.

            • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Quite far down the list. Of the 40 countries, per GDP they’re what, 32nd? And that’s after decades of chronic underspending, where their capability has crumbled.

              war propaganda

              War propaganda is when you have a credible defence. Right-o.

              • indexBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Having an higher GDP doesn’t mean you have to spend more

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well sure, but it’s a good start for a comparison. Best would be to add in the existing capability, the level of threat, size of the country, that sort of stuff.

                  It’s just that even Germans have now realized that their chronic underspending has really hurt them and now to have any sort of respectable defence they’ll need to spend more. A more moderate amount for a longer time would’ve been better but it is what it is.

                  • indexBanned from community
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Removed by mod