You’re being deliberately disingenuous in your interpretation, but I’ll respond anyways for the benefit of others here.
What I suggest is that if you truly care deeply about these issues, you should devote quite a bit more time and effort into actually learning about it and related subjects, and seeking meaningful ways to get personally involved in a much more impactful position. Try starting here if you need a push in the right direction.
Honestly, how you managed to figure that learning and counterinsurgency equates to armed rebellion can’t really be explained any other way than you’re being deliberately obtuse.
Iirc it’s more like vandalize factories and act like you don’t know anything.
If you identify as a resistance person, a socialist, an anarchist, a communist, and those things seem like tangible real-world organizations, maybe that’s a plan. It doesn’t seem like it would really take off in agricultural areas though.
You’re being deliberately disingenuous in your interpretation, but I’ll respond anyways for the benefit of others here.
What I suggest is that if you truly care deeply about these issues, you should devote quite a bit more time and effort into actually learning about it and related subjects, and seeking meaningful ways to get personally involved in a much more impactful position. Try starting here if you need a push in the right direction.
So armed…revolution? Am I reading between the lines correctly?
Did you check the link?
Honestly, how you managed to figure that learning and counterinsurgency equates to armed rebellion can’t really be explained any other way than you’re being deliberately obtuse.
Well I’m not, but it’s 240 some pages, so maybe you could help me out a bit.
Iirc it’s more like vandalize factories and act like you don’t know anything.
If you identify as a resistance person, a socialist, an anarchist, a communist, and those things seem like tangible real-world organizations, maybe that’s a plan. It doesn’t seem like it would really take off in agricultural areas though.
You don’t have to read all 240 pages to understand what it’s about. The title alone tells you what it’s about.
And really, if this is actually such a critical issue, is 240 pages truly an undue burden?