@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-29 months ago2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlimagemessage-square318fedilinkarrow-up12Karrow-down1152
arrow-up11.85Karrow-down1image2023-08-09.jpglemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-29 months agomessage-square318fedilink
minus-square@gravitas_deficiencylinkEnglish15•9 months agoIn a programmatic context? Sure. In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not. 2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00 is WAY more human legible than 1691696733.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•9 months agoWhat, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•9 months agoIt’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”
In a programmatic context? Sure.
In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not.
2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00is WAY more human legible than1691696733.What, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
It’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”