I have an early 2000s PC (pre-SATA) with 512MB RAM (I’d love to tell you about the CPU, but its under a cooler that isn’t going anywhere) that’s been sitting in closets for about 15 years. Assuming I’m willing to buy into it, can something like that reasonably host the following simultaneously on a 40GB boot drive:

Nextcloud Actual Photoprism KitchenOwl SearXNG Katvia Paperless-ngx

Or should I just get new hardware? Regardless, I’d like to do something with this trusty ol business server.

Edit: Lenovo or Dell as the most cost-effective, reliable self-host server in your opinion?

    • BigVault@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want something small and cheap, it might be worth getting a used thin client PC.

      I got a cheap £20 Igel thin client from eBay as raspberry pi’s were still far too expensive, plus I already had a spare 4GB ddr3 sodimm to drop into it and a 120gb wd green ssd that I’d stripped from its case and fitted internally into the thin client.

      After upgrading it one ended up with a 1.2ghz AMD GX-412 cpu, 4gb DDR3, 120gb sata ssd and an external usb 3 1tb hard drive i also had laying around.

      As a component of my homelab, it’s running Debian 12, docker with a few containers (pigallery 2, Libreddit, portainer, searXNG), it’s my backup Emby server and my main Pihole and PiVPN client.

      Completely silent, sips power and still has capacity spare to run more containers and other projects that catch my interest.

      https://www.parkytowers.me.uk/thin/Igel/ud/ud3/M340C/

      • LazerDickMcCheeseOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a pretty cool solution, honestly. I’m considering all options here! I’d hate to invest then find out there are more cost-effective options or that I somehow limited the server’s potential.

        • Briongloid@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what I’m using, it barely uses more power than a pi & it’s a 64bit x86 4core with 16GB Dual Channel, 256GB SSD.

          I’ve seen newer versions of what I have for cheaper than the average Pi4, I would never consider the Raspberry over this solution given how monolithically more powerful it is for how small they are.

          I have Ubuntu 22.04 LTS Server without a desktop GUI and I control it on my PC via CMD with SSH user@localipaddress

        • BigVault@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Working really great for me. I originally just bought it to run Pihole on a dedicated machine and have a secondary pihole instance on my Unraid server in case either of them went down but leaving it sitting there with just PiVPN and Pihole duties seemed wasteful.

          I’m getting even more out of it running some of the lighter containers on it with plenty of spare room to do more.

          I’ve logged/uploaded my upgrade process here just so you can get some ideas on what I did.
          https://imgur.com/a/ExcLdtt

          It is bulkier than a raspberry pi, being around the size of a router but the low cost and being able to utilise hardware that I had sitting doing nothing made me go this route rather than just getting a pi.

    • glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s OK, but I’d suggest:

      Atom > arm64 > arm32

      I ran on a Pi 4, but switched to a PC for jellyfin. The pi can’t transcode for shit. It was slow to boot and slow over SSH.

      Look for a NUC - they’re designed for desktop use, so they have more poke than a Pi. The N6005 CPU is a good choice, the N5105 is ok. These are x64, so you’ll have the widest range of packages. 4GB will do, if its upgradeable later. NUCs usually take SODIMMs, which you can pick up on ebay for peanuts.

      Bear in mind that network chipset will be your bottleneck in some use cases. If it has a “gigabit port” but only a cheap chipset, and you use it as a router, you might max out at ADSL speeds… in that case you’ll wish you’d gone for a box designed for soft routing, which are a fair bit pricier.

      • solberg@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was slow to boot and slow over ssh.

        I found that booting and connecting over SSH went way faster once I got a better SD card. Running an install script that took half an hour was down to just a couple minutes

    • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ll put it this way as somebody barging into the conversation: I love tinkering with SBCs, but setup, install, usage, and maintenance are all a hell of a lot easier on x86 still.

      Personally I have very little energy for unexpected issues, and when I gave up on SBCs for serving (as opposed to tinkering) everything got much easier and my progress got much faster.

      I’ve been buying dirt cheap used business PCs for servers, works great, doesn’t break the bank, and there are tons of parts available if you stick to the major manufacturers.