• zifk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually we both screwed up by a factor of 1000, the article states 190 becquerels of tritium per litre, not cubic meter.

    Seems like you have the right order of magnitude, but the sources I’ve seen gives the ocean close to 0.5-2 TU, or “Tritium Units” which correspond to 180 Bq/m^3. So I wouldn’t call the water being released as cleaner, just basically on average with the ocean already.

    https://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/fac/etg.tmp/text/woce_method.html https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969718348034

    • LazerFX
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why I should stick to computing ;) Thanks for the update.

      • baked_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still the comment should be and stay top because it’s far more informative than most of comments usually

        • LazerFX
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks - I did edit it to say whoops, but it’s still pretty informative I’d say. People get silly about radiation and then go out and tan in the sun for a few hours :P