What evolutional benefit is that?

  • dreadgoat
    link
    fedilink
    -210 months ago

    Also what’s the definition of “passing?” The dinos we are talking about are extinct, they didn’t “pass” for long. A+ creatures things like alligators, ants, and crabs. On average a given species survives around a million years before going extinct. How long do you have to exist before you’re considered a successful species?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2310 months ago

      T. rex was around for 20 million years or so, I’d say they passed for long enough to be considered successful. Despite the tiny arms.

      • dreadgoat
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I think that’s been narrowed down to about 2 million years. But that got cut short by a mass extinction event, so it’s hard to say how long they would have lasted otherwise.

        • Pennomi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 months ago

          If you can’t survive a mass extinction are you even really alive?

          • @fsxylo
            link
            English
            510 months ago

            A question that’s going to be surprisingly easy to answer in the near future.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      100+ million years qualifies as right in the middle of “for long” in my book. The fact that an asteroid or comet of biblical proportions wiped them out has nothing to do with evolutionary effectiveness. Most of the animals that did survive either A) lived in water or B) lived underground.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      310 months ago

      I don’t think science really categorizes species based on how successful they were. “Passing” in this sense refers to the individuals in the species who were able to reproduce, not the population as a whole. Most dinosaurs “passed” until ecological conditions killed them off, they didn’t die because they failed to adapt. A lot of the species that survived mass extinction events were just lucky, rather than having some ideal set of characteristics that allowed them to survive.

      • dreadgoat
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I agree that most species surviving mass extinction events were just lucky, but I think that also says something special about the ones that survived MULTIPLE events (ants), or those that effectively re evolved into existence after extinction events (crabs)