• krayj
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feinstein is an order of magnitude more cognizant than McConnell, and yet a great many Dems want to see her removed also…and you just don’t see that kind of parity with the GOP.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t go as far as to say the lady who tried to give a speech during a roll call vote, ceded power of attorney to her daughter and has to heavily rely on her staff to function is more mentally cognizant than the turtle by any stretch. He’s struggling, but she’s on another level.

      But you’re right, there’s at least calls from the Dems to kick her out, so there is a decent difference between the two parties. I just wish the leadership felt the same way.

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Leadership wants her out, and she finally accepted the option of letting another Democratic senator temporarily fill her position on the Judiciary Committee while she was unable to attend for many, many weeks in the most recent episode - but Republicans refused.

        At that point, Democratic leadership can decide that they want her out so badly that they’ll simply hand Republicans a win. Or they can try to get her back in her seat with her hand on the button, so that Democrats can get at least a few wins in the Judiciary Committee.

        I want Feinstein out, but I still think Democratic leadership made the correct decision.

    • jscummy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s reports from colleagues that they need to repeatedly reintroduce themselves to her during the same meeting. She was completely unaware of her own months long absence from the capital.

      There’s definitely more Democrats calling for her retirement than GOP calling for McConnells (AFAIK there are zero), but saying she’s an “order of magnitude more cognizant” is pretty damn generous

    • minorninth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s ridiculous, Feinstein is clearly far more gone.

      The issue isn’t her replacement, it’s that Dems would lose control of all of the committees she’s on.

      I don’t believe for one second that Democrats and Republicans are the same or equally corrupt.

      In this case, though, it does seem like they’re both playing the same stupid game due to their own seniority rules.

        • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what anyone was objecting to. He’s frozen for a minute twice whereas she was unable to even be at the capitol for months and then was unaware of that fact when asked

          She is MAGNITUDES worse than McConnell and it isn’t even close.

          • krayj
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Having a several minute long seizure of some kind is, in my opinion, significantly worse than any behavior Feinstein exhibits. It was bad enough it happened once. If it’s happened twice on camera we have to assume that it happens more off camera and that it’s now a regular occurrence. Regardless, that part of my comment was intended to be subjective. But all you said was “Uhhh. That’s just not at all true.” without specifying whether you were challenging one word of my comment or the entire thing, so I’m forced to interpret your statement as a challenge to my entire comment. Also, you misquoted me. I said “an order of magnitude” not “magnitudes”.