@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agoBoys With a Time Machine VS Girls:lemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1963arrow-down151
arrow-up1912arrow-down1imageBoys With a Time Machine VS Girls:lemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squarePons_Aeliuslinkfedilink5•10 months agoWhy not just strangle Jesus in his manger? Definitely no Calvinism then.
minus-square@PsychedSylink6•10 months agoYou’re assuming he existed and was necessary for the cult to start. Paul may be a better target.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•10 months agoYou don’t have to assume Jesus existed, you just have to accept the historical evidence which there is plenty of
minus-square@PsychedSylink1•10 months agoI am fine accepting historical consensus on the subject, but I personally have some issues with that particular specialty and their allegiances. I’d argue assume is apt as there’s no proof, but there’s sufficient evidence to support acceptance.
Why not just strangle Jesus in his manger?
Definitely no Calvinism then.
You’re assuming he existed and was necessary for the cult to start. Paul may be a better target.
You don’t have to assume Jesus existed, you just have to accept the historical evidence which there is plenty of
I am fine accepting historical consensus on the subject, but I personally have some issues with that particular specialty and their allegiances.
I’d argue assume is apt as there’s no proof, but there’s sufficient evidence to support acceptance.