@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoGoogle Chrome pushes ahead with targeted ads based on your browser historywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square360fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down124file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]becomeme[email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1external-linkGoogle Chrome pushes ahead with targeted ads based on your browser historywww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square360fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]becomeme[email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoHow is this not sneaky/intentionally misleading? If you say “no, I do not want Enhanced Ad Privacy” then they won’t track you. If you say “yes, I want the Enhanced Ad Privacy” then they will track you. (*track you in the sense of what’s discussed here, the local browsing history) I’m sure EU will consider this as not compliant. And no, I never used Chrome. And also no, monopolies should not be able to fully dictate their own ToS.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoI disagree in that it’s misleading. But how dafuq du they have a monopoly on web browsers? That’s just stupid
How is this not sneaky/intentionally misleading?
If you say “no, I do not want Enhanced Ad Privacy” then they won’t track you.
If you say “yes, I want the Enhanced Ad Privacy” then they will track you.
(*track you in the sense of what’s discussed here, the local browsing history)
I’m sure EU will consider this as not compliant.
And no, I never used Chrome.
And also no, monopolies should not be able to fully dictate their own ToS.
I disagree in that it’s misleading. But how dafuq du they have a monopoly on web browsers? That’s just stupid