• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -5410 months ago

    Just because someone’s against THIS “vaccine” doesn’t mean they are an ‘antivaxxer’. Lumping everyone together for one view is dangerous.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3810 months ago

      Yes it does.

      There is literally nothing of substance behind the claims that “this one is different” it’s the exact same argument from the exact same unreliable sources. Literally the ONLY difference is that this vaccine was made controversal by American politics.

      If you are against the covid vaccine then you are an anti-vaxxer, whether you realize it or not.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s not strictly true.

        This was the first FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, so it is “different”.

        Source

        Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.

        • @Jakeroxs
          link
          English
          1510 months ago

          Technically correct, but that doesn’t mean it’s any less safe by all accounts.

          https://www.vumc.org/viiii/infographics/how-does-mrna-vaccine-compare-traditional-vaccine

          https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_makes_an_rna_vaccine_different_from_a_conventional_vaccine

          https://healthcare.utah.edu/coronavirus/vaccine/mrna-vaccine

          I imagine you’re not actually against the Vaccine, just pointing out the factual truth that it is indeed different then prior vaccines, however that doesn’t on it’s own make it unsafe.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I never said (or even implied) it was less safe, only that saying it’s no different than previous vaccines is not true.

            You’re putting words in my mouth

            • @Jakeroxs
              link
              English
              8
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I agreed with you?

              Even said, “I imagine you’re not against the vaccine” because you were getting down voted because people are weird about facts that sound like something a nut would say even if factually true.

        • volvoxvsmarla
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          You’re technically correct so I don’t understand the downvotes, you most obviously didn’t imply anything else. Love the mrna technology, went out of my way to get vaccinated during pregnancy (because Germany was a bit slow with that), literally worked on Covid, Anti-Covid meds and mRNA in the lab, and you’ll have my upvote. You’re the best kind of correct after all. Don’t get discouraged.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Most people here do not have fully functioning brains and cannot distinguish someone being correct from someone blathering nonsense.

          Upvotes and downvotes are purely based on whether or not your vibes match their expectations.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      The thing is, there are several vaccines for covid available worldwide.

      I’ve never heard an anti-“THIS”-vaccine person ever say “I just don’t want to use mRNA so I want the J&J vaccine” or anything of that nature.

      All I ever heard was lies, pretending covid wasn’t severe or that ivermectin is a protective or that there’s 5G magnetism in the vaccine.