Meredith Whittaker reaffirms that Signal would leave UK if forced by privacy bill::Meredith Whittaker, the president of the Signal Foundation, the organization that maintains the Signal messaging app, spoke about the U.K.'s controversial new privacy bill at TC Disrupt 2023.

  • SimplePhysics
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Matrix has absolute shit adoption, but is open source and pretty secure. Then there is always Telegram.

    • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you still have to consciously enable encryption in Telegram? That was the gripe people had with it for a while. Chats weren’t encrypted by default.

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay cool. Thanks. Oh I didn’t even know telegram had encryption capability

      • SimplePhysics
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Almost every chat platform uses encryption by default, including telegram. If you are talking about E2EE, you have to enable that manually for each chat.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.fmhy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Matrix is really awesome and I hope it becomes the gold standard. However, if I were a Snowden, I would pick signal over matrix for the simple reason that signal doesn’t store your conversations on the server. Matrix does. Those conversations are encrypted client side with a key the server doesn’t have, but they are still stored centrally. That has advantages and disadvantages. It is much better for usability, because you can log in from any device and you see all of your conversations in one place. Unlike signal, there are no primary and linked devices, you can run matrix on desktop, laptop, phone, tablet, or straight from a web browser. When logging in from a new device, you need your username, password, and to either authenticate the session from another device, or manually put in your encryption key to decode the chats. That also means there is no need for backup or restore of anything other than your encryption key. For that reason, I am more frequently pushing people to install matrix than signal these days.

      However if security is more important than usability, signal wins, if only because there is never a question of storing anything on any server. Start a chat with somebody, make the messages disappearing, and you can be pretty sure that as long as neither of your devices are captured while the chat is in progress it will never be seen by anybody.

      • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This breakdown makes me much more hesitant to ever use Signal over Matrix. Signal is storing the keys themselves, where as Matrix is storing messages that can’t be decrypted and no keys. If the keys on Signal’s servers are ever stolen, you can kiss all of your message privacy goodbye. If a Matrix server is hacked, the user can’t do anything with the messages because they’re encrypted and no keys are stored.

        You also have the option to host your own Matrix server and have more control—something that is not an option with Signal.

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The key that is stored server-side by Signal are only used to decrypt your profile, your contacts and groups, and your app settings. It is not used to decrypt your messages. And my understanding is that if you set a secure password instead of a pin, the key will be encrypted by your password before being uploaded, anyway, meaning that it’s e2ee, too.

          Also, you can host your own Signal server, though I suspect doing so is more complicated than hosting a Matrix server. The code is almost fully open source (and I only say “almost” because, in the past it was not uncommon for the code on Github to be several months out of date - the license is a FOSS license). However, Signal isn’t federated, so you wouldn’t be able to talk to anyone using the Signal app or a fork on the main Signal server - unless you forked the app and made it able to manage accounts on multiple different servers.

          Matrix also doesn’t encrypt metadata and it syncs conversation metadata to every involved server. As recently as 2022 Matrix had several critical vulnerabilities discovered (and patched). I wasn’t able to find any record of the audits mentioned in that article, so I have no clue how they performed, but regardless, even if just based on the metadata alone, currently Signal is more secure.

          From a FOSS perspective, it makes sense to prefer Matrix over Signal (or maybe XMPP?). Signal - Moxie specifically - has been downright hostile to forks (refusing to allow them to use the Signal server with their frontend fork) and I remember him rejecting PRs and being rude toward contributors, too, though my memory’s a bit fuzzy on the specifics. That was a few years ago, so maybe it’s gotten better, but even if so, Signal isn’t federated and likely never will be, so any developer would have a lot more flexibility building things for Matrix or contributing to existing Matrix projects.