• deranger
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not “paying off” as this isn’t implemented anywhere, thus not making money.

      I think you’re way off the mark and buying into the hype. That’s my opinion from an electronic medical record software analyst.

        • deranger
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m in cardiology - radiology is right across the hall. We’re both under ancillary services. Lab techs are not rad techs, and rad techs don’t read films. You don’t work in this field, do you?

          None of this is implemented so none of it is paying off.

          Also nobody thinks this will take their jobs, because it looks like Theranos to us, in that it’s very hyped in tech and ridiculous to those of us in the medical field.

            • deranger
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Dude, I am an Epic analyst. We’re a 10 star organization (ie cutting edge adoption of features).

              I don’t know how to tell you how wrong you are. None of this is even remotely near production.

              Helping with SlicerDicer queries is not reading a film. This is a ridiculous comparison.

              Again, even language processing features are not remotely near production. It’s not even in any proof of concept environments.