• deranger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not “paying off” as this isn’t implemented anywhere, thus not making money.

    I think you’re way off the mark and buying into the hype. That’s my opinion from an electronic medical record software analyst.

      • deranger
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m in cardiology - radiology is right across the hall. We’re both under ancillary services. Lab techs are not rad techs, and rad techs don’t read films. You don’t work in this field, do you?

        None of this is implemented so none of it is paying off.

        Also nobody thinks this will take their jobs, because it looks like Theranos to us, in that it’s very hyped in tech and ridiculous to those of us in the medical field.

          • deranger
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Dude, I am an Epic analyst. We’re a 10 star organization (ie cutting edge adoption of features).

            I don’t know how to tell you how wrong you are. None of this is even remotely near production.

            Helping with SlicerDicer queries is not reading a film. This is a ridiculous comparison.

            Again, even language processing features are not remotely near production. It’s not even in any proof of concept environments.