Bonus points if it’s usually misused/misunderstood by the people who say it

  • mnemonicmonkeys
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No, the “well-regulated militia” actually referred to a desire to have all able-bodied men of military age to commonly have most of the skills needed to fight in a war in case of a draft, such as marksmanship and survival skills, as well as already owning most of the necessary equipment.

    What’s important to note is that the US had a very small standing military for most of its history. It relied on being able to conscript a large number of recruits whenever a war started, and sent them home whenever the war was over. This requires a lot of the citizenry to already know most of the skills they’d need to raise an army quickly.

    • monsterpiece42@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, so because the state had a military people were allowed to have guns? That’s shockingly similar to what I said.