Pressure grows on Apple to open up iMessage::Samsung has joined Google’s campaign to force Apple to make iMessage RCS-compatible—but European regulators are more likely to get that job done.

    • crab@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Never looked into it, what’s so bad about RCS besides it being proprietary? Way better than SMS in my experience.

      • Instrument_Data@livellosegreto.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everything is better than SMS.
        And everything except SMS is better than RCS.

        Let me use a fucking messaging app, I’ll just need any internet connection and it will works and it get constantly updated.

        RCS is just SMS2

        • crab@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then everyone needs to download and make an account on said app, they already exist and none are unanimous.

          Everyone has a phone number that gets used for auth and other things. If that system doesn’t change then RCS is way better.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Confidently incorrect but ok.

        The whole point of RCS is that it’s a protocol so there demonstrably would be other apps. It’s like saying there’s only one app for SMS, it isn’t true.

      • crab@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        RCS seems to be pretty openly licensed out to other OEMs, definitely a lot better than iMessage.

        It’s still proprietary though, a far cry from something like Matrix.